There are two contrasting views on the effectiveness of exposure to sensorially dysregulating stimuli in children: those who follow the behaviorist approach and those who support neurodiversity.

Behavioralists believe that exposing children to overwhelming stimuli repeatedly can help increase their tolerance and regulation around the trigger. However, this approach can actually be counterproductive and may teach children to suppress their emotions rather than regulate them. This is because the behaviorist approach focuses on changing behavior through conditioning, rather than addressing the underlying emotional and neurological factors that contribute to dysregulation.

On the other hand, neurodiversity-affirming supporters understand that exposure to overwhelming stimuli can cause actual harm to a child's developing brain and nervous system. They believe that every child's sensory experience is unique and that it is important to provide individualized support and guidance in regulating their emotions. Effective strategies include identifying and avoiding triggers whenever possible, providing calming activities and sensory experiences, and teaching specific coping skills for managing emotions.

Therefore, it is important to take an individualized approach to supporting children with sensory dysregulation. Exposing individuals to potentially harmful stimuli in an attempt to increase tolerance and the overt signs of dysregulation is invalidating to neurodivergent individuals. Learning sensory triggers, dysregulating stimuli, and regulating stimuli is the foundational work that when combined with a support personnel (e.g., parents, teachers, etc) providing support, co-regulation, and self-regulation is affirming of the individual’s neurotype. This approach will promote healthy brain development and long-term well-being.

Supporting research:

1. Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B., & Gal, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(1), 1-11.
2. Green, S. A., & Ben-Sasson, A. (2010). Anxiety disorders and sensory over-responsivity in children with autism spectrum disorders: Is there a causal relationship? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(12), 1495-1504.
3. Leekam, S. R., Nieto, C., Libby, S. J., Wing, L., & Gould, J. (2007). Describing the sensory abnormalities of children and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(5), 894-910.
4. Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(6), 608-620.
5. Case-Smith, J., & Arbesman, M. (2008). Evidence-based review of interventions for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(4), 416-429.
6. Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 397-422.
7. Lane, S. J., Reynolds, S., & Thacker, L. (2010). Sensory over-responsivity and anxiety in typical children and children with autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Cause or coexistence? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 453-464.
8. Engel-Yeger, B., & Dunn, W. (2011). The relationship between sensory processing difficulties and anxiety level of healthy adults. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74(5), 210-216.
9. Jones, S. M., & Miller, G. E. (2013). The psychological costs of exposure to uncontrollable stressors in children and adolescents. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 29-34.
10. Glover, V. (2011). Annual research review: Prenatal stress and the origins of psychopathology: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(4), 356-367.
11. Schore, A. N. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1-2), 7-66.
12. Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
13. Perry, B. D. (2001). The neurodevelopmental impact of violence in childhood. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake (pp. 103-128). New York: Brunner-Routledge.

1. Hahn, E. J. (2011). Risk of harm to children who experience developmental trauma: Potential impact on their life span. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 8(4), 420-429.
2. Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2012). The whole-brain child: 12 revolutionary strategies to nurture your child's developing mind. New York: Delacorte Press.
3. Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. New York: Penguin Books.
4. Mullen, E. M., & Gorman-Smith, D. (1998). Parenting in community context: The role of social support, social capital, and parenting efficacy. Family Relations, 47(4), 323-332.
5. Sajed, S., & Lee, H. (2018). Exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: An overview of evidence-based treatment. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 39(4), 191-199.
6. DeKlyen, M., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). Attachment and psychopathology in childhood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 637-665). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Fosha, D. (2000). The transforming power of affect: A model for accelerated change. New York: Basic Books.
8. Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
9. Siegel, D. J. (1999). The developing mind: Toward a neurobiology of interpersonal experience. New York: Guilford Press.
10. Fonagy, P., Steele, M., & Steele, H. (1991). Intergenerational patterns of attachment: Maternal representations during pregnancy and subsequent infant-mother attachments. Child Development, 62(4), 891-905.
11. Gunnar, M. R., & Donzella, B. (2002). Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27(1-2), 199-220.

It seems like we have a new reality for the foreseeable future. One of these realities is wearing face coverings (masks) to protect ourselves and those around us while outside our homes. 

It is important to recognize that Autistics, those with sensory processing disorder, and other neuodiverse people may have a difficult time wearing masks for a variety of reasons. It is important that we avoid extreme dysregulation/ melt downs as they pertain to wearing masks.  When meltdowns happen as a result of mask wearing it is alright to focus on the other avoidance techniques of social distancing and avoiding public places/ gatherings.  Don't force mask wearing if that mean a melt down will happen, remember that we want to honor the communication from our littles even if the message is something we don't want to receive.

Written by: Emily Swogger, OTR, MS

At Therapy Center of Buda we feel strongly about outdoor free play and providing our kiddos with a safe outdoor play space. Why are we so passionate about play? Because a child’s main occupation is to play. Play is how they learn new information in the most efficient manner. Yet in a world where children can spend up to 1200 per year on average in front of a screen, play time is rapidly being replaced with screen time. Time spent outside for children, research has shown, can be as little as 7 minutes per day!  Time spent in play in general can be as low as 30 minutes per day. Play-based activities are being decreased for a variety of reasons. On the early education front, a societal emphasis on increasing test scores or meeting Common Core requirements has shifted the focus of early learning and preschool from social emotional skills to building math and reading skills. After-school the amount of play time is decreased due to lack of time to engage in play between longer work hours and the nightly routines of dinner, homework, and bath time. For some, lack of a safe place to play in neighborhood playgrounds and parks is also contributing factor to a decrease in outside play time.  

So, why is the loss of unstructured play so important?

BY LAUREN DROBNJAK

This Sensory Halloween Scavenger Hunt is the perfect way to keep kids calm if they’re nervous or overwhelmed by Trick or Treating.

For some kids, Halloween is the best holiday of the year — candy, anyone? For others, it’s a night of complete sensory overload. From itchy costumes to strange new sounds, this spooky October evening can be a nightmare for kids with sensory processing concerns or even for kids who just get overwhelmed easily.

We thought it would be fun to take our popular Sensory Motor Scavenger Hunt and twist it up…Halloween style!

Whether your kiddo just needs a little distraction from the scary chainsaw house in the cul-de-sac or she needs a way to take it all in from a distance, we think this Halloween scavenger hunt will fit the bill.


Original source: https://theinspiredtreehouse.com/sensory-halloween-scavenger-hunt/

While playing with playdoh can give optimal time to address receptive language, expressive language, pragmatic language, sensory, fine motor, gross motor, and handwriting development not all kiddos are able to safely play with it. Sometimes kiddos eat the playdoh or they are gluten sensitivity.  Well, we have the solution! Follow the recipe below for some EDIBLE GLUTEN FREE PLAYDOH!

Edible Gluten Free Playdoh Recipe
Ingredients:
-Baby rice cereal
-Vegetable oil
-Cornstarch(or gluten-free cornflour if you are in the UK or Australia)
-Unsweetened Applesauce (you can substitute water if you don't have applesauce)
-Food coloring (optional)